The
scenario is: "estoppel doctrine versus "false churches" doctrines".
What is a doctrine of estoppel? And how will it helps prove the criminal
liabilities of "false churches" in case of calamities? But
before proceeding, let us first review the man's rules on evidence and
how the "words" that are stated in "The Word", which others call as "The
Holy Bible", are to be treated as evidence.
Taking for example the verses from 2 Kings, stating as follows:
23Everything else that Jehoram did is recorded in the History of the Kings of Judah. 24Jehoram died and was buried in the royal tombs in David's City, and his son Ahaziah succeeded him as king.(2 Kings 8:23-24, TEV).
Given
the above set of of allegations, is it possible to establish the truth
on the same despite the absence of physical evidence of the Kingdom of Judah or the history book being referred in the verses? How about the truth of burial of Jehoram in
the royal tombs in David's City or the existence of the royal tombs in
David's City? or the truth on succession of kingship from Jehoram to his
Son Ahaziah or the presumptive paternity of King Jehoram over King Ahaziah?
Can they be established as "truth" in the Courts of law?
